|
On
3 October 2007 the Union Home Minister Shivraj Patil outlined some crucial
concerns in the fight against terrorism in New Delhi, at the conference of Directors-General
and Inspectors-General of Police, like low police-population ratio, inadequate
strength and inefficiency of the intelligence agencies in the states, and presence
of terrorist sleeper cells in mega cities.
The
police-population ratio in India is very poor at 1:728, it was 1:600 as
mentioned by the Home Minister in August 2005 to Parliament, with women
constables constituting only 2.5 per cent of that number. The all-India average
police-population ratio stands at 122 per 100,000, which is much lower than the
UN norm of 222 per 100,000 (1:450). Most western countries have ratios between
250 and 500 per 100,000. Russia has a ratio of 1:82 and Australia 1:439. While
Pakistan has a ratio of 1:625, Japan and Singapore have 1:563 and 1:295
respectively. Even developing countries like Thailand with 1:228 have a much
better ratio than India.
Inadequate
strength of the intelligence agencies is another impediment in most Indian
states due to vacant positions not being filled for years. Police personnel on
intelligence duties are estimated to comprise only 1% to 1.5% of the total
police force. For example, in Uttar Pradesh only 1,500 policemen are on
intelligence gathering jobs. The efficiency of the Local Intelligence Bureaus in
the states needs immediate improvement to deal with the menace of terrorist
attacks and understand their modus operandi to prevent such attacks. Apart from
strengthening the Special Branches in states, replacing the much-needed Police
Act of 1861 with a new one, which could meet the growing challenges to policing,
was also sought.
Though
the National Police Commission (1977) had recommended a Model Police Act to
replace the ancient Police Act of 1861, there is no political will to implement
it. The Supreme Court directive (22 September 2006) directed the Centre and
States to create a National Police Commission and State Security Commission to
improve the overall functioning of the police. According to the "Report to the
People - UPA Government, 2004-07,", the government has approved
79 battalions to strengthen internal security and improve the police-population
ratio. Apart from restructuring the CISF and CRPF for better performance, 20,000
new posts were created for these two forces.
The
59-page paper on "Internal Security Situation" issued by the Union Home Ministry
in March this year reveals that terrorist violence in Jammu & Kashmir has shown
"significant improvement", in the Northeast states it finds a "marginal
increase", and Naxal violence in six states.
But terrorist attacks in other parts of India are negligible as noticed in a
small chapter "Terrorist Violence in Hinterland." The paper recommends
"measures taken to meet the challenges", and asks the states to strengthen
their local capabilities through Police Modernization (PM) and Security Related
Expenditure (SRE) apart from revamping the Special Forces.
Most
terrorist financing in India occurs through informal channels, including hawala; hence the use of fake currency is a cause of concern. The sleeper cells,
which are often funded with fake currency, have the capacity to become active
at will. These cells have developed an effective mechanism to escape the attention
of intelligence agencies. India has set up a Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU)
under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, in March 2006 to counter fake
currency. It sifts through suspicious transaction, but it lacks staff and adequate
support from other domestic law enforcement agencies.
According
to the draft report of the Counter Terrorism Committee of the UN Security
Council, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has developed measures to protect the
financial system from being used to fund terrorism, including bringing
authorized money changers under a regulatory mechanism. However, RBI guidelines
do not extend to institutions beyond the scope of its mandate; hence these
institutions are sometimes subject to lower regulatory standards. This report
adds that Indian states do not have specialized units to analyze threats. It
recommends that India should consider allowing the Central Bureau of
Investigation (CBI) to handle more counter-terrorism cases.
The
Hindustan Times (11 September, 2007) reported that India has witnessed over
70,000 deaths, including that of 11,000 security personnel - more than in all
the wars fought since Independence - killed by terrorists. With the most
sophisticated technologies being available to terrorists, fighting terrorism has
become an increasingly difficult task for India. It becomes even more
challenging when states lack specialized police forces, effective intelligence
mechanisms, and cutting-edge technology. Only a trained police force in adequate
numbers with timely intelligence inputs can fight the menace of terrorism. The
citizens' role is equally important, and the Home Minister has proposed the
creation of civil defense units for local policing, while suggesting the need
for security committees in the villages. |